New York Times Abortion Essay

I am posting the full text of this essay because it has been my experience that the NY Times website makes it difficult to access archives, and I want every person reading this post to know precisely what has been said. Women do not simply deserve full humanity and citizenship (and thus ownership of our bodies), we need these things. All the statistics tell us that historically and currently, in the US and internationally, in ‘First’, ‘Second’, and ‘Third World’ nations, the rate of abortions performed remains constant regardless of the state of legality. So no, even fixing economics, even creating ‘religious states’, even offering birth control and medical care do not and will not replace the basic need for women to have the absolute legal right to safe medically supervised/performed abortions. Unless you believe that being a woman is an offense punishable by execution. And if you do, you may take full personal responsibility for every woman murdered by legal policies that prevent women from obtaining safe abortions.

Repairing the Damage, Before Roe

Tony Cenicola/The New York Times

Published: June 3, 2008

With the Supreme Court becoming more conservative, many people who support women’s right to choose an abortion fear that Roe v. Wade, the 1973 decision that gave them that right, is in danger of being swept aside.  When such fears arise, we often hear about the pre-Roe “bad old days.” Yet there are few physicians today who can relate to them from personal experience. I can.

I am a retired gynecologist, in my mid-80s. My early formal training in my specialty was spent in New York City, from 1948 to 1953, in two of the city’s large municipal hospitals.

There I saw and treated almost every complication of illegal abortion that one could conjure, done either by the patient herself or by an abortionist — often unknowing, unskilled and probably uncaring. Yet the patient never told us who did the work, or where and under what conditions it was performed. She was in dire need of our help to complete the process or, as frequently was the case, to correct what damage might have been done.

The patient also did not explain why she had attempted the abortion, and we did not ask. This was a decision she made for herself, and the reasons were hers alone. Yet this much was clear: The woman had put herself at total risk, and literally did not know whether she would live or die.

This, too, was clear: Her desperate need to terminate a pregnancy was the driving force behind the selection of any method available.

The familiar symbol of illegal abortion is the infamous “coat hanger” — which may be the symbol, but is in no way a myth. In my years in New York, several women arrived with a hanger still in place. Whoever put it in — perhaps the patient herself — found it trapped in the cervix and could not remove it.

We did not have ultrasound, CT scans or any of the now accepted radiology techniques. The woman was placed under anesthesia, and as we removed the metal piece we held our breath, because we could not tell whether the hanger had gone through the uterus into the abdominal cavity. Fortunately, in the cases I saw, it had not.

However, not simply coat hangers were used.

Almost any implement you can imagine had been and was used to start an abortion — darning needles, crochet hooks, cut-glass salt shakers, soda bottles, sometimes intact, sometimes with the top broken off.

Another method that I did not encounter, but heard about from colleagues in other hospitals, was a soap solution forced through the cervical canal with a syringe. This could cause almost immediate death if a bubble in the solution entered a blood vessel and was transported to the heart.

The worst case I saw, and one I hope no one else will ever have to face, was that of a nurse who was admitted with what looked like a partly delivered umbilical cord. Yet as soon as we examined her, we realized that what we thought was the cord was in fact part of her intestine, which had been hooked and torn by whatever implement had been used in the abortion. It took six hours of surgery to remove the infected uterus and ovaries and repair the part of the bowel that was still functional.

It is important to remember that Roe v. Wade did not mean that abortions could be performed. They have always been done, dating from ancient Greek days.

What Roe said was that ending a pregnancy could be carried out by medical personnel, in a medically accepted setting, thus conferring on women, finally, the full rights of first-class citizens — and freeing their doctors to treat them as such.

Waldo L. Fielding was an obstetrician and gynecologist in Boston for 38 years. He is the author of “Pregnancy: The Best State of the Union” (Thomas Y. Crowell, 1971).

hat tip to elm

Advertisements

~ by heycarahe on June 3, 2008.

3 Responses to “New York Times Abortion Essay”

  1. Let me remind all who wish to comment that the FAQs (i.e. ‘How not to piss Cara-he off’ ) specifically state that this is a radical feminist blog, and that all comments must meet the test of understanding the tenents of radical feminism. This is not the place for you to come expecting someone else to do your homework (e.g. ‘please provide me with links to stats on abortion rates in various countries’). I have neither the time nor the inclination to do so. If you think I’m making egregarious statements, the onus is on YOU to dig up stats to prove me wrong.

    That said, let me be very clear: I am not ‘pro-choice’. I am pro-abortion. This is not the default position of radical feminism, but it IS the default position of this blog. Regarding sex selective abortions: every woman should have the right to terminate any and all of their own personal preganancies at any time for ANY reason. I see no reason in imposing a ban on abortion to prevent discrimination against (potential) female children. Living under the patriarchy makes that discrimination de facto.

    The solution is to smash the patriarchy, not impose ‘cultural relativist’ bans on abortion.

    And criminalizing the abortionist IS criminalizing the abortion, and thus the woman seeking it.

  2. […] person reading this post to know precisely what has been said. Women do not simply deserve fullhttps://delvecarahe.wordpress.com/2008/06/03/new-york-times-abortion-essay/Minti – 2 vessel cord-single umbilical artery– WHAT IS IT??This is something id like people to be […]

  3. […] person reading this post to know precisely what has been said. Women do not simply deserve fullhttps://delvecarahe.wordpress.com/2008/06/03/new-york-times-abortion-essay/Uganda: West Nile’s Only Ultrasound Scanning Machine Stolen AllAfrica.comIN the face of public […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: